skip to Main Content
+44 (0) 1953 888811  sales@hoodjeans.co.uk

WHY YOU SHOULD NOT TRUST ‘SINGLE LAYER’ MOTORCYCLE JEANS

Reading this may just save your skin. (Updated 2020)

For a number of years now we have voiced concerns about ‘Single Layer’ motorcycle jeans and just how poor the level of protection they provide can be. During this time we have tested many ‘Single Layer‘ denims. None have made the level where we would be happy to put our name on the product. Many have failed badly during testing, demonstrating to us a real problem with protection.

During the last year (2019) we have carried out further research, testing some of the latest ‘Single Layer’ denims. We also produced a full-specification prototype Hood ‘Single Layer’ Jean to help with our investigations. CE testing of this prototype ‘Single Layer’ Jean showed it would reach an AA classification. However, alarms started to ring after we performed a simple rub test, after a very short distance the ‘Single Layer’ denim failed and a hole appeared. When repeating the same rub test on a double layer construction no holes appeared. The samples were then sent for more in-depth laboratory abrasion tests, and although the results were not all bad, the ‘Single Layer’ denim still didn’t reach the level that meets our expectations or the level were we would be happy to supply a customer.

We understand people are looking for comfort and wearability, but any motorcycle jean worth consideration should also give the protection needed when called upon. With regard to comfort; the weight of the Hood ‘Single Layer’ prototype was a major surprise. We expected the ‘Single Layer’ sample to be much lighter compared to the fully lined K7 Infinity Jean; however the ‘Single Layer’ version only weighed in slightly lighter – by just136grams to be exact. We feel this small saving wouldn’t make much difference with regard to comfort, especially when taking the compromise with the loss of protection into account.

In the past the motorcycle jeans that we saw that had failed were those styles that had small panels of protective lining covering certain ‘so-called’ crash areas. These jeans failed where the lining didn’t cover, causing injury to the skin below. More recently the fashion for ‘Single Layer’ motorcycle jeans seems to have taken over from the panelled style of motorcycle jean. However, we strongly feel that the ‘Single Layer’ style of motorcycle Jean also has major flaws, meaning riders could be putting themselves at risk of injury whilst actually believing they were fully protected.

We acknowledge that, when new, the ‘Single Layer’ type of denim (a cotton / man-made fibre mix) is relatively strong. During this time it can pass some of the new CE classifications. However, what happens to the ‘Single Layer’ denim after a year or two, after the jean has been worn and washed several times? At what point does the cotton element of the fabric start to deteriorate and lose its strength, as happens with all cotton / denim fabrics? At this point will the jeans provide the same protection as when they were first tested? Our experience suggests not. I therefore wonder whether the brands involved should consider including a ‘use by date’ on their products? Again, I think probably not. I have witnessed one ‘Single layer’ jean that was a little too long for its owner; this caused the wearer to step on the back of the hem, and after only a few times being worn the denim had worn through. This doesn’t really fill you with confidence! If you put your trust in a ‘Single Layer’ and that one layer fails, there is no second chance; no second layer to save your skin. The deterioration seen with cotton does not happens with the K-tech fabric, so even if the outer denim fails there will always be the 100% para-aramid layer to save your skin.

‘Single Layer’ denim just does not afford the same level of protection as a double layer construction. The main factor for this is that any benefits provided by the hi-tech protective fibre are simply diluted by the lower-performing cotton it is combined with to construct the denim. Some aramid / cotton denims feature a 24% aramid / 76% cotton construction. This means the single layer material contains over three times more cotton than aramid within the mix. This simply does not give the same protection level as a 100% aramid layer.

Multi-layer constructions work in the same way as do laminates, which outperform the individual properties of each separate layer from which they are constructed (the whole is greater than the sum of the parts). In addition, the separate layers can move relative to each other, improving flexibility.

In the ‘real world’, just how strong is a brand new pair of ‘Single Layer’ Jeans? In RiDE Magazine’s July 2019 issue, they performed a ‘destruction test’ on twelve motorcycle jeans currently on the market. Four of these were ‘Single Layer’ jeans, they scored 2/10, 4/10, 5/10 and 6/10 for protection. The double layer Hood K7 Infinity Jean scored an impressive 10/10 for protection; the K-tech lining remaining totally intact throughout all four tests and resulting in the K7 Infinity Jean being awarded a RiDE ‘Best Buy’ triangle.

The term ‘Single Layer’ is a little misleading; ALL ‘Single Layer’ motorcycle jeans should really incorporate a second ‘Airflow’ mesh lining. This layer reduces shear-force injuries; the skin abrasions which occur due to the movements between the outer fabric, when it is in contact with the road surface, which causes the back surface of the material to transfer these forces direct to the wearer’s skin. Linings in garments are essential to providing “shear-force interception” and they do this by remaining static on the wearer’s skin, whilst the movements of the outer layer take place against the reverse face of the lining. Multi-layer constructions amplify this benefit.

Slide times are another question we have been asked about over the past year (we guess this is because of the new motorcycle clothing standards). Many brands are quoting the so called ‘slide times’ for their jeans, but the real purpose of the figures is to show how the abrasion testing machine is functioning and it is not included in the criteria for assessing whether a material passes or fails. On the Darmstadt abrasion test, the pass / fail criteria is established by the size of hole (if any) when the machine comes to a halt.

Slide times, along with distance to stop, are calibration measurements for the test apparatus, to determine whether or not the coefficient of friction between the test sample and the abrasive surface is within specific parameters. One test sample may slide further compared to another, however just because it slides further doesn’t make it better; it simply means it has less drag on the road compared to a sample that has more drag. There is a school of opinion that a garment with a higher coefficient of friction might be better, because the rider will slow to a halt in a shorter distance and might avoid collisions with roadside obstacles which a garment with a lower coefficient of friction might cause them to hit. The crucial thing is, has the material passed the test and at what speed?

Please be aware of two misleading tricks we have seen from some companies;

  1. The deliberate attempt to fool people by quoting test times from the Cambridge machine against ‘slide times’ from the Darmstadt machine. We have seen one company that claimed its product’s 10:00 second (higher than level 2 – EN13595 standard) test result from a Cambridge machine was bettered by an 11:00 second slide time tested on the Darmstadt machine. This is not the case and test results and so-called slide times from both machines should not be compared against one another in any way.
  2. I have seen some (but not all) abrasion resistance times which have been generated on Cambridge-type impact abrasion machines set up to test motorcycle gloves. The motorcycle glove standard EN 13594:2015 specifies a 120-grit abrasive belt, which generates entirely different results to the OP60 belt specified in the motorcycle clothing standard: EN 13595-2:2002. The abrasion resistance times on the glove belt can be up to three times longer than those on the clothing belt, so the ‘real’ clothing result might be as little as one third of the reported value. Check the CE certification of the garment thoroughly and look for the CE User booklet and ‘Declaration of Conformity’; if these are not available then the products are probably not fully CE certified.

The combination of our denim with the K-tech and mesh lining in the K7 ‘Infinity’ Jean has been tested to the following on the Darmstadt machine;

Initial speed: 707 rpm
Time to stop: 5.696 seconds
Distance to stop: 87.728 metres

This passes the AAA classification of the provisional European Standard FprEN 17092 and enables the K7 jean to be certified and CE marked in accordance with the requirements of the new EU PPE regulation 2016/425

During our history we have collated a large amount of data and information from real crashes, our own drag tests and independent test houses. Until last year, all testing was performed on the Cambridge machine; however, with the introduction of the new PPE standards (EN 17092), the Darmstadt machine is now used. The Darmstadt machine does not give the actual time to failure for the material; instead it replicates a slide and tests whether perforation of the construction is smaller than half a centimetre. This means a material could far exceed the level needed, but by how much is not known. It also means a product may just reach the required level, but by the smallest of margins, yet would achieve the same certification classification as a product that far exceeds the requirement. To compound this problem, the abrasion test levels for the new PPE standards have not been set that high, this is the reason for our concerns that some poor products may sneak through and achieve certification.

For this reason we have decided to continue to test on both the Cambridge and Darmstadt machines, so we can back-check data from current testing with data from that of the past twenty years.

There have always been two types of motorcycle jeans on the market, the jean that offers a token effort towards protection and the jean that puts protection at the top of its list of priorities. The K7 Infinity Jean has always sat firmly in the second category. We have been producing motorcycle jeans for over twenty-two years, and during that time a Hood Jean has never failed to protect its owner when called upon, a fact we are very proud of. We understand comfort is an important factor. This is why we have spent so much time over the years focussing on development of softer, more breathable fabrics. We do, however, feel the double-layer construction is an important design feature that works by increasing performance and helps bring the protection level of a man-made material closer to that of decent leather.

Whether a garment is CE certified or not, we still believe a little homework is required before purchasing. Thank you for taking the time to read our thoughts,

Yours Sincerely

Chris Easterford

EU AA Class Certified Motorcycle Jeans
AA Performance Class Motorcycle Jeans
EU Certified Motorcycle Jeans
EU Certified Hood Motorcycle Jeans
EU AA Performance Class Motorcycle Jeans
AA Class Certified Motorcycle Jeans
Hood Motorcycle Jeans EU Certified
EU Certified Motorcycle Jean

I just wanted to give a little feedback regarding my K7 jeans men’s blue denim. They’ve arrived yesterday morning and

I just wanted to let you know that I received my K7 Hood Jeans, along with the D30 hip and

G’day. I live in Adelaide, South Australia. I am literally gob smacked! I ordered 2 pairs of your magnificently fitting

Today I have received the order and the jeans are...... fantastic! Purchasing online for the first time from an unknown

I was in a fairly serious motorbike accident on Thursday where a car pulled out on me at the last

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for making such an excellent product. This week I crashed losing the front

In June 2017 I toured Northern Italy on a Lambretta for three weeks. On the way home the scooter had

Hi - just wanted to say how pleased I am with the Cargo Jeans in black D30 armour. I bought

Thank you to Hood jeans! You literally saved my skin! Not a scratch!

I have been looking for a pair of riding jeans & had read a ton of blogs and biker mag

I visited you and bought a pair of jeans back in May. I just wanted you to know that while

Just wanted to say a big thanks for the K7's, delivered yesterday - 7 days to regional South Australia is

I crash tested my HOOD JEANS whilst trying to learn to wheelie. Obviously we were practising on private land, with

I’ve been wearing my Hood Jeans since 2007. Last autumn I put them to the ultimate test when a stolen

Just a quick email to say thank you for the quality of the jeans. I had a 40 mph fall

Great buying experience! I am very pleased with the product received and the speedy delivery. This is my second pair

The Jeans arrived yesterday and I cannot thank you enough. They fit like real jeans unlike some of your competitors. I am

Just a short mail to say how impressed I am with the cargo jean my wife purchased recently for me

I bought a pair of Hood Jeans this year. I did always feel comfortable but in the back of my

Just received my K7 Jeans. What can I say? Wonderful Jeans can compete with any number of premium jeans brands. It

My K7 Jeans stood up to a 60mph slide; part of which had a 200kg bike on top of them

Subject to our recent telephone conversation concerning the high speed accident I had whilst wearing my Hood jeans. As you

Back To Top